At the time of this writing, in 2025, it has been a little over a decade since legislative programs started popping up in various states to promote STEAM education. “STEAM’, the incorporation of arts into ‘STEM’ (Science Technology Engineering Mathematics), was as much an admission as a new concept. It was an admission that something was being lost in our zeal to produce American scientists, engineers and computer programmers to boost our national competitiveness in an increasingly technocratic world, namely the arts and humanities. Before getting into the subject of what art education has to offer the sciences and vice versa), it’s worth taking a look at the tension that exists between the arts and humanities and STEM subjects in general.
During my time at UF, I encountered a dismissive attitude towards the humanities among some science and engineering majors. They viewed any required humanities courses as an onerous waste of time, and degrees in the humanities as a flat-out waste of resources. The internet would eventually produce a derogatory moniker for such people: STEM lords. I was repelled by the STEM lord attitude, and I weighed in on the debate in a letter to the student newspaper that made it into print, appealing to the ideal of the ‘Renaissance man’ and arguing that figures like Isaac Newton and Leonardo da Vinci would hardly approve of such a narrow view of education.
Several semesters after I began teaching organic chemistry, I was approached by a pair of former students who wanted me to serve as the faculty advisor and sponsor of their student club. This club would be called Art for All, and although it was open to the entire student body, its purpose was to give overstressed pre-health and STEM majors a creative outlet through visual art. I rediscovered my lost love of art through this club, and I decided that wherever my career went, making visual art would always have a prominent place in my life. During our weekly meetings, in which we would simply draw and paint, I witnessed the emotional strain that students in these challenging science majors were under, and the therapeutic value of creative pursuits. I also confirmed what I had long suspected, that my experience of being discouraged from pursuing a creative career was all too common. How many frustrated artists, musicians, poets and writers are out there doing fine and important work in medicine, information technology, engineering and basic science research but feeling like their life’s true passion has been relegated mere hobby status, if they were able to stay connected to it at all?
The question of what the arts can substantially offer to the education and practice of science is a separate issue from this tragedy of lost creative fulfillment. But it is connected, because it’s the thwarted creatives working and teaching in STEM fields who are in the unique position to be able to realize and maximize the benefits of such offerings. Who better to apply the lessons of art to science than those scientists who are artists at heart?